1 Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Kyiv, Ukraine)
2 Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Kyiv, Ukraine)
Received: 30 September 2020 / Accepted: 1 November 2020 / Published: 3 December 2020
The modern theory of argumentation is an interdisciplinary field of research. The sphere of interest of argumentation theory embraces the most effective tools of persuasion in interpersonal communication. At the same time, the focus is on studying not only how the argumentative process is built but also the areas where argumentation is used. Such interest contributes in particular to the study of cultural features, which in turn influence the development of the argumentative process. A key feature of this process is multimodality, which consists of the use of verbal and nonverbal modes. This paper is devoted to the analysis of our research project focused on the multimodal view on aggressiveness in interpersonal arguing.
Keywords: multimodal argumentation, aggressiveness, interpersonal arguing, Ukrainian identity, controversy, empiricalization
Bura, Kateryna (2020) Toward the Definition of Multimodal Argumentation. Future Human Image, Volume 14, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/14/1
Eemeren, Frans Hendrik van (2015) Bingo! Promising developments in argumentation theory. Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory. Springer, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21103-9_1
Finocchiaro, Maurice A (2013). Meta-argumentation. An approach to logic an argumentation theory. London: College Publications.
Gilbert, Michael (1994) Multimodal argumentation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Volume 24, Issue 2, 159-177.
Groarke, Leo (2015) Going multimodal: what is a mode of arguing and why does it matter? Argumentation, Volume 29, 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9336-0
Hample, Dale (2003) Arguing skill. Handbook of communication and social interaction skills. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 439-478.
Hample, Dale (2005) Arguing: exchanging reasons face to face. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-010-9180-9
Hample, Dale (2018) Interpersonal arguing. New York: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b12877
Hample, Dale and Amanda L. Irions (2015) Arguing to display identity. Argumentation, Volume 29 (4), 389-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9351-9
Khomenko, Iryna (2018) Empiricalization as a trend in argumentation study. Future Human Image, Volume 10, 20-28. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/10/2
Khomenko, Iryna (2020) Aggressiveness as a qualifier of dissent in interpersonal arguing. Reason to Dissent. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation. College Publications. pp. 23-33.
Khomenko, Iryna and Dale Hample (2019) Comparative analysis of arguing in Ukraine and the USA. In Bart Garssen, David Godden, Gordon R., Mitchell, Jean H.M. Wagemans (Eds.) Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat, 628-639.
Khomenko, Iryna, and Kateryna Bura (2019) Facing Aggressiveness in Face-to-Face Arguing. Ukrainian Policymaker, Volume 4, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.29202/up/4/2
Santibanez, Cristian (2020) Inference to the best metaphor. Reason to Dissent. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation. College Publications. pp. 305-310.
Walton, Douglas N. (1998) The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument. University of Toronto Press.